Company News
| Wednesday, 02 May 2012 |
|
RusRating has changed the outlook on Bank of Moscow’s credit rating from “uncertain” to “stable”. The rating itself remains unchanged at “AA+” and “BBB+” on the national and international scales respectively. |
According to the agency, the change in outlook (from “uncertain” to “stable”) reflects ongoing solid federal government backing sufficient to offset financial risks.
The rating is based on the financial and political support of the Moscow authorities; a system-critical role in the Russian capital; and a solid, well-developed presence in virtually all segments of the banking market at the national level.
Constraining factors include reliance on political connections.
|
|
Read more... |
| Thursday, 03 May 2012 |
|
RusRating confirms the following bank and company credit ratings as of 03rd of May 2012 |
| Thursday, 26 April 2012 |
|
RusRating has increased Trust National Bank’s credit rating from “BBB” to “BBB+” on the national scale. Rating outlooks on both the national and international scales have been adjusted from “stable” to “positive”. |
According to the agency, the positive outlook and rating increase reflect expanding credit activity and improved earnings generated by rising returns on core operations.
The rating itself is based on the Bank’s highly-developed business and infrastructure, steady growth trends, and a favourable assessment of corporate governance.
Constraining factors include low capital adequacy, unstable financial results and above-average sensitivity to risks.
|
|
Read more... |
| Thursday, 26 April 2012 |
|
RusRating has increased the credit rating of Garant-Invest Bank from “BBB” to “BBB+” on the national scale, with a stable outlook. |
According to the agency, the rating increase reflects reduced sensitivity to credit risks against the background of rising profitability and an increase in reserve coverage.
The rating itself is based on membership in an established financial-industrial group; political connections; a stable client base and market niche; satisfactory financial indicators coupled with a positive growth trend; and good liquidity management.
Constraining factors include risks arising from dependence on the business connections of the parent group; exposure to affiliated credit risks; a funding base highly dependent on key clients; poorly diversified lines of business; and a generally minimal market share.
|
|
Read more... |
Our Opinion
| Wednesday, 06 July 2011 |
|
ABOUT BANK OF MOSCOW |
In response to questions from one of our subscribers, RusRating has prepared the following comments on its recent Bank of Moscow report. We believe that other subscribers should also receive this information.
Questions to the agency about the recent change in Bank of Moscow’s rating outlook:
1) What do you mean by "possible application of radical regulatory measures"? We assume you are referring to the announced substantial rescue package for Bank of Moscow. |
|
Read more... |
| Tuesday, 05 October 2010 |
|
Bank of Moscow under observation |
Fitch may cut rating Following the dismissal of Mayor Yuri Luzhkov Fitch, an international rating agency, added Bank of Moscow to its list of negative outlooks. The agency’s concerns are linked to the bank’s highly concentrated funding base: five major depositors account for 20% of the balance sheet.
|
|
Read more... |
| Wednesday, 09 June 2010 |
|
Risk Management Post Crisis. |
Andrei Kozlov repeatedly said that he considered risk managment to be one of the most promising professions in the financial industry. As on many other issues, Andrey Andreevich was a thinker well ahead of his time.
The global crisis was caused by poor risk management and by the very agencies that are supposed to measure risk. Indeed the very companies that were supposed to have the most sophisticated risk management systems in the world and which invented risk management techniques failed. Yet the crisis ironically demonstrated how much we rely in the modern financial word on risk management and on rating agencies.
|
|
Read more... |
| Wednesday, 10 March 2010 |
|
Crisis will force investors to reassess banking risks in Kazakhstan An interview with RusRating senior analyst Victoria Belozerova on TV K+ |
The refinancing of debt is a normal, everyday process for banks in any country, but opportunities for doing so are cut back sharply during a crisis. That is what happened in Kazakhstan, where a large portion of bank funding was drawn from the international capital market. The inability to refinance that debt made restructuring inevitable. Political factors made negotiations with investors more complex in the case of Kazakhstan than for, say, Russian banks: cases of less than entirely successful state intervention aimed at “saving” certain major banks were taken as a signal to re-evaluate the associated risks. Even so, the Kazakh market remains attractive for top players in the banking sector. New loans are, of course, a possibility, but regulators [in Kazakhstan] are taking a whole range of steps to open up new funding opportunities for both banks and the real sector, including access to Russian capital and the resources of international financial institutions and the development of a domestic debt market. I expect there will be a process of consolidation, including an increase in the market share of foreign banks, and that can also be seen as normal for a country whose economy has been weakened by the crisis but at the same time has clear prospects for further development. |
|
|
|
| Dynamics of bank credit ratings distribution |

|
|